Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: things to break..
From: shok () MOKIMAKI ETHEREAL NET (Matt Conover)
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 03:14:39 -0800
Napster was actually written fairly well. It will not send any file that doesn't have any mp3 header information and it's been written by security-conscious people (napster and nocarrier are in w00w00). On Sun, 23 Jan 2000 Inedag () AOL COM wrote:
since we're on the topic, how about napster? that's in use by a bazillion people .. although i don't know how fair that'd be to the napster people, as i think they're still in beta. just a suggestion. -i
Current thread:
- Re: HTTP scanners?, (continued)
- Re: HTTP scanners? Seth R Arnold (Jan 24)
- Re: CGI insecurities David Taylor (Jan 23)
- Re: CGI insecurities Blue Boar (Jan 23)
- Re: things to break.. Matthew S. Hallacy (Jan 23)
- Re: things to break.. Jeff Bachtel (Jan 23)
- Re: things to break.. Matt Conover (Jan 24)
- Re: things to break.. Jordan Ritter (Jan 25)
- Re: things to break.. WHiTe VaMPiRe (Jan 24)
- Re: things to break.. Jordan Ritter (Jan 25)
- Re: things to break.. Jordan Ritter (Jan 25)
- Re: things to break.. Matt Conover (Jan 24)
- Re: things to break.. John Galt (Jan 24)
- Re: things to break.. Matt Conover (Jan 25)
- Re: things to break.. Simple Nomad (Jan 25)
- Re: things to break.. Jordan Ritter (Jan 25)
- ICQ Pass Cracker. WolF Knox (Jan 26)
- Re: ICQ Pass Cracker. Blue Boar (Jan 26)
- Re: ICQ Pass Cracker. Usman (Jan 26)
- Re: ICQ Pass Cracker. Vladimir Dubrovin (Jan 27)
- Shadow kjkotas (Jan 24)
- Re: Secure coding in C (was Re: Administrivia #4883) Marc Slemko (Jan 21)