Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Naptha - New DoS
From: White Vampire <whitevampire () mindless com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:17:01 -0500
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 05:38:34PM +0100, Carl-Johan Bostorp(ctor () krixor xy org) wrote:
I find it rather odd that this has yet to be mentioned on Bugtraq.
I have since changed my mind. I find it in poor taste.
I don't. As the advisory itself says - the problem is ancient. Only new thing seems to be someone finally sat down and did what everybody else thought of (or had done but not released =)). More of a thing for security-incidents.
This concept is ancient, NAPTHA however has a new twist. It should be taken more seriously.
I've been using xinetd for ages to have protection from this type of attack.
inetd is not the only daemon affected by this attack. Regards, -- __ ______ ____ / \ / \ \ / / White Vampire\Rem \ \/\/ /\ Y / http://www.projectgamma.com/ \ / \ / http://www.webfringe.com/ \__/\ / \___/ http://www.gammaforce.org/ \/ "Silly hacker, root is for administrators."
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Naptha - New DoS White Vampire (Dec 08)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Carl-Johan Bostorp (Dec 08)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS White Vampire (Dec 09)
- Message not available
- Re: Naptha - New DoS White Vampire (Dec 09)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS rpc (Dec 09)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Sebastian (Dec 10)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Damian Menscher (Dec 10)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Filipe Almeida (Dec 16)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Bruno Morisson (Dec 17)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS White Vampire (Dec 09)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Carl-Johan Bostorp (Dec 08)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Lincoln Yeoh (Dec 09)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Michael H. Warfield (Dec 09)
- Re: Naptha - New DoS Jose Nazario (Dec 09)