Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: lpd exploit?
From: Mark <tort () TORT DETHBYSTEREO COM>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:26:32 -0600
This is paranoia. By default, redhat 7 runs lpd as user 'lp', and I have never seen any exploits for this daemon. mark tort () dethbystereo com On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 root () MICROSOFT COM wrote:
Not sure if this is true or not, but I thought I'd give a heads-up...
Current thread:
- lpd exploit? root (Dec 01)
- Re: lpd exploit? Olaf Kirch (Dec 02)
- Re: lpd exploit? Crist Clark (Dec 04)
- Re: lpd exploit? Mark (Dec 02)
- Re: lpd exploit? Jarno Huuskonen (Dec 04)
- Re: lpd exploit? Larry W. Cashdollar (Dec 04)
- Re: lpd exploit? Ron DuFresne (Dec 04)
- Re: lpd exploit? Ryan Yagatich (Dec 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: lpd exploit? John (Dec 07)
- Re: lpd exploit? John (Dec 07)
- Re: lpd exploit? Ron DuFresne (Dec 08)
- Re: lpd exploit? Graeme Fowler (Dec 09)
- Re: lpd exploit? Theodor Ragnar Gislason (Dec 09)
- Re: lpd exploit? Graeme Fowler (Dec 09)
- Re: lpd exploit? Ron DuFresne (Dec 08)
- Re: lpd exploit? Olaf Kirch (Dec 02)