Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: Win2K Local DoS?

From: bfiero () BINARY MENTALFLOSS NET
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 0100 18:02:54 +0000

So, how the hell Microsoft managed to get their patchwork certified is
beyond me. It could just be that some of the threats & bribes rumors
are true, no? :)


The system specified for testing was not on a network. As soon as you hook a M$
box to a network, all security certifications are invalid. NT, and now Win2k,
are and never will be network worthy systems.

It's the catch-22 certification.

Current thread:

Re: Win2K Local DoS?, (continued)
- Re: Win2K Local DoS? Dimitry Andric (Aug 03)
- Re: Win2K Local DoS? Alexander Sanda (Aug 03)
- Re: Win2K Local DoS? LordRaYden (Aug 05)
- Re: Win2K Local DoS? Oliver Friedrichs (Aug 03)
- Re: Win2K Local DoS? Maxime Rousseau (Aug 05)
  - Re: Win2K Local DoS? Dimitry Andric (Aug 05)
    - Re: Win2K Local DoS? Kevin Stephenson (Aug 06)
    - Re: Win2K Local DoS? Mikael Olsson (Aug 08)
    - Re: Win2K Local DoS? Nicolas Rachinsky (Aug 09)
  - Re: Win2K Local DoS? pantera (Aug 05)
- Re: Win2K Local DoS? bfiero (Aug 09)
  - Re: Win2K Local DoS? Timothy J. Miller (Aug 10)
    - Re: Win2K Local DoS? Richard Rager (Aug 14)