Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: TCP Sequence Prediction
From: Dean () PUTNAMCOMPANY COM (Dean Michael Dorman)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:08:59 -0400
the boxes were sp5'ed but thanks to a couple of subscribers they are now hotfixed. BTW I don't choose to have NT as my exposed OS to the net but my CIO does. hands tied and all. -----Original Message----- From: Maxime Rousseau [mailto:mrousseau () SECURED ORG] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:05 PM To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM Subject: Re: TCP Sequence Prediction I belive SP6a fixes the TCP sequence prediction issues. if not i am certain there is a hotfix for it. In fact, if i remember correctly, the whole SP6 vs SP6a deal was about this hotfix not being in... Someone correct me if i am wrong here :) What SP were those NT boxes at? M. Secured Industries Why fear the unknown? -----Original Message----- From: VULN-DEV List [mailto:VULN-DEV () securityfocus com]On Behalf Of Dean Michael Dorman Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 1:17 PM To: VULN-DEV () securityfocus com Subject: TCP Sequence Prediction Pardon me if this is a trivial question but after nmapping several servers I find that NT boxen usually come up with: TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=trivial time dependency Difficulty=6 (Trivial joke) I was wondering how to increase the security here (besides removing NT and installing OpenBSD). _____________________________________ Dean Michael Dorman, Information Systems Putnam Company, Wellsboro, PA 16901 ------------------------------------------------------------- Challenge the integrity of your information. -------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: TCP Sequence Prediction Rob Lindenbusch (Apr 02)
- Re: TCP Sequence Prediction Maxime Rousseau (Apr 03)
- Re: TCP Sequence Prediction Panagiotis Malakoudis (Apr 03)
- Re: TCP Sequence Prediction Philipp Buehler (Apr 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TCP Sequence Prediction Dean Michael Dorman (Apr 03)