Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: Netaddress and amexmail

From: BlueBoar () THIEVCO COM (Blue Boar)
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 21:46:53 -0700


Fabio Pietrosanti wrote:


Does you know the existance of cookie ? :)


I think that's the answer in this case.

Though, the question is valid.  There do exist web services
that put everything needed in the URL, so saving the URL
will work.  Some also have a timeout, so the same URL no longer
works 5 minutes later, which could explain a friend not
being able to use the URL because time has passed.

Those are really dumb, especially for web e-mail.  If someone
mails you a link, and you click on it, guess what shows up
in the site's log as a referer...

                                BB

Current thread:

Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbuffer overflow with long filenameextensions. LiGHTNiNG (Apr 24)
- Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbufferoverflow with long filenameextensions. Markus Kern (Apr 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbuffer overflow with long filenameextensions. Schockaert, Rudy (Apr 24)
  - Netaddress and amexmail Arturo Busleiman (Apr 25)
    - Re: Netaddress and amexmail Fabio Pietrosanti (Apr 27)
    - Re: Netaddress and amexmail Blue Boar (Apr 27)
    - Re: Netaddress and amexmail Marc Slemko (Apr 28)
    - Re: Netaddress and amexmail Arturo Busleiman (Apr 28)
    - Re: Netaddress and amexmail Stone (Apr 27)
  - Exploit Ease Level Rory Savage (Apr 25)
    - Re: Exploit Ease Level Max Vision (Apr 26)
    - Re: Exploit Ease Level Rory Savage (Apr 28)
    - Using php to bounce scan Thiebaut (Apr 28)
    - Re: Using php to bounce scan Omachonu Ogali (Apr 28)
    - Re: Using php to bounce scan Thiebaut (Apr 30)
    - corrupted link JklojLrnzn () AOL COM (Apr 30)

(Thread continues...)