tcpdump mailing list archives

Re: openwrt Conclusions from CVE-2024-3094 (libxz disaster)


From: Francois-Xavier Le Bail via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:06:28 +0200

--- Begin Message --- From: Francois-Xavier Le Bail <devel.fx.lebail () orange fr>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:06:28 +0200
On 01/04/2024 20:18, Guy Harris wrote:
On Apr 1, 2024, at 6:53 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca> wrote:

I wonder if we should nuke our own make tarball system.

I.e., replace:

      to get {libpcap,tcpdump,tcpslice} version X.Y.Z, download 
{libpcap,tcpdump,tcpslice}-X.Y.Z.tar.{compression-suffix}

with

      to get {libpcap,tcpdump,tcpslice} version X.Y.Z, do

              git clone {repository}

      and then check out Git tag {libpcap,tcpdump,tcpslice}-X.Y.Z?

If so, do we

      1) require people to have autotools installed and run ./autogen.sh

or

      2) generate the configure scripts on some standard platform and check it in

so that they have a configure script?  Or is there some other way to arrange that people can get the configure 
scripts?

Even if we keep the tarball archive, we could have a host compromise (bad autoconf, etc.) and if the "configure" script 
is generated on it, we risk to open a door to an attack.

Thus, don't deliver "configure" in the tarball and ask to run "./autogen.sh" with autotools installed.


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org
To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-leave () lists tcpdump org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s

Current thread: