tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: pcap segment violation
From: Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:16:16 -0500
Daniel H. Bahr <dhbahr () gmail com> wrote: > my previous reply was sent before I saw your last message. > There IS a chance more than one instance of the Object owning the > native methods would be created IF there would be need to sniff at > several network interfaces simultaneously; in which case there would > be a single instance of the class for each network interface to be > sniffed. > Could this raise the issues you mention above? You have only one *jni variable, that might be a problem if it will be different in different threads/contexts. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr () sandelman ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Re: pcap segment violation, (continued)
- Re: pcap segment violation Guy Harris (Feb 12)
- Re: pcap segment violation Guy Harris (Feb 12)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: pcap segment violation Daniel H. Bahr (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Daniel H. Bahr (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Guy Harris (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Guy Harris (Feb 12)
- Re: pcap segment violation Guy Harris (Feb 12)
- Re: pcap segment violation Daniel H. Bahr (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Daniel H. Bahr (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Daniel H. Bahr (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Guy Harris (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Michael Richardson (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Daniel H. Bahr (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Guy Harris (Feb 13)
- Re: pcap segment violation Daniel H. Bahr (Feb 14)