tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number
From: Denis Ovsienko <infrastation () yandex ru>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:01:03 +0400
08.02.2013, 21:55, "Michael Richardson" <mcr () sandelman ca>:
"Denis" == Denis Ovsienko <infrastation () yandex ru> writes:Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and UDP layer. It could apply to TCP too, perhaps.Denis> It looks like -T applies. I've got a working code and am Denis> producing a sample capture. The ZeroMQ decoding function is Denis> called from both tcp_print() and udp_print(), should I put it Denis> into an existing file or a new file? Which of license Denis> boilerplates then? New file. 2-clause BSD please.
I was wrong about print-udp.c before, ZMTP/1.0 framing is TCP-only. But anyway it's a new file (pull request #50). -- Denis Ovsienko _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Feb 08)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Feb 08)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Feb 12)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Jan 31)