tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number
From: Denis Ovsienko <infrastation () yandex ru>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:00:20 +0400
Currently the -T option is the only resort at the IP layer and UDP layer. It could apply to TCP too, perhaps.
Thanks, that seems to be OK to start with.
It would be nice to have a way for each ULP decoders to register their name so that it's not so switch() stmt based, and then to have a file which can be provided to map multiple ports at the same time.
I'll look if that can be done quickly. -- Denis Ovsienko _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Jan 31)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Feb 08)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Feb 08)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Denis Ovsienko (Feb 12)
- Re: verbose decoding without assigned port number Michael Richardson (Jan 31)