Re: Patch-question

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Oct 10, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Gerrit Renker wrote:

> So what happens next - I think that the bug fix should go to the  
> other branches
> as well, since the tool prints the wrong values.

The only relevant branch is the x.9 branch (the other branches are  
dead; nobody's going to make an 0.7.x release), and, as Ken Bantoft  
indicated in recent mail that he'd "like to see [a 1.0 release of  
libpcap] out for Halloween, or a week sooner, if that works
for everyone", there might not be another x.9 release, either.

> What will happen to the other two

The other two what?  Patches?  As per my mail:

> > having submitted three patches last year on this list which were  
> > accepted but
> > apparently never made it into the repository,
>
> No, Hannes Gredler checked them into the main branch near at the end  
> of 2006 - and acknowledged at least two of them in an e-mail reply  
> to the list (I only found two patches, the first of which fixed the  
> DCCP bug and added support for variable-length checksums).

so I'm not sure what patches of yours *haven't* been checked into the  
main branch by Hannes.  Are there any?  If so, which ones are they?
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.