tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: New DLT_ value request
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:27:04 -0800
On Dec 20, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Will Barker wrote:
...and 4 bytes long, as per the earlier discussion, or just 1 byte (or2 bytes)?We may as well make it just 1 byte since it only can specify 2 alternativevalues!
OK, I added: DLT_PPP_WITH_DIR 204 /* PPP */ DLT_C_HDLC_WITH_DIR 205 /* Cisco HDLC */ DLT_FRELAY_WITH_DIR 206 /* Frame Relay */ DLT_LAPB_WITH_DIR 207 /* LAPB */
So what's the format of the packet data in your proprietary encapsulation type?This is still to be confirmed - I was only trying to get the valuein-place/reserved following your comment "ask ASAP, so I can try to get it into libpcap 1.0". If this is a problem then we'll have to leave it for now.
I added a comment reserving the value 208. - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- New DLT_ value request Will Barker (Nov 28)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Guy Harris (Nov 28)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Will Barker (Nov 29)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Guy Harris (Nov 29)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Will Barker (Nov 30)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Guy Harris (Dec 12)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Will Barker (Dec 18)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Guy Harris (Dec 19)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Will Barker (Dec 20)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Guy Harris (Dec 21)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Fulko Hew (Dec 21)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Will Barker (Nov 29)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Guy Harris (Nov 28)
- Re: New DLT_ value request Will Barker (Dec 12)