tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0)
From: "Guy Harris" <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 15:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Felipe Kellermann wrote:
Thanks. I will look at the resulting assembly in the different toolchains and processos and systems and eventually discuss this subject with the GCC or binutils people.
I.e., suggesting that they standardize on a particular behavior for shifts greater than the width of the item being shifted, and change the GCC code generator to ensure that behavior (even though ANSI C doesn't require any particular behavior)? - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 27)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 27)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 28)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Guy Harris (May 28)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 28)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Guy Harris (May 28)
- Re: net net/len (0.0.0.0) Felipe Kellermann (May 27)