tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: proposed tcpdump dinner @IETF55
From: Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ottawa on ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:00:47 -0500
"Bill" == Bill Fenner <fenner () research att com> writes:
>> It might be that Fenner won't even have AD duties at that time Bill> No such luck, I've got to at least try to go to the sub-IP area Bill> meeting. However, given my level of contribution to tcpdump.org Bill> stuff lately I'm not the best person to be a blocker. Well, join us for appetizers. Corn bread can be an entire meal! Any other responses? I'd like to make a reservation. ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] mcr () sandelman ottawa on ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [ - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:tcpdump-workers-request () tcpdump org?body=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited, (continued)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Andrew Brown (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Andrew Brown (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Michael Richardson (Dec 18)
- Re: Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 19)
- Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 18)
- Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Andrew Brown (Dec 18)
- Re: -e vs. -x, revisited Guy Harris (Dec 19)