Snort mailing list archives
Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1
From: "Seth Dunn" <seth () d2ms com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 10:33:32 -0400
Maybe try dropping the -k switch I was using the -K switch, and that was causing me issues....I believe the -K and -k switch are pretty similar it function. But as you noticed in the last email, see what others say regarding versions between snort and the rules being processed. That could be the problem. -----Original Message----- From: C. L. Martinez [mailto:carlopmart () gmail com] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:25 AM To: Seth Dunn Cc: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Seth Dunn <seth () d2ms com> wrote:
Also, what is your command line for running PP?
Simple: pulledpork.pl -c /data/config/etc/idpsnort01/pulledpork/pulledpork.conf -k -vv ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1, (continued)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 JJ Cummings (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 JJC (May 10)