Snort mailing list archives
Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1
From: "C. L. Martinez" <carlopmart () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 14:07:01 +0000
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:01 PM, C. L. Martinez <carlopmart () gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Seth Dunn <seth () d2ms com> wrote:Ok, so /so_rules/ is present What about /rules/ Cause it appears that it is trying to work within that directory. /data/config/etc/idpsnort01/rules/Correct, and this directory exists ... root@plzfnsm01:/tmp# ls -la /data/config/etc/idpsnort01/rules/ total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2560 May 9 13:55 . drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 May 9 13:55 ..
Yep, maybe the problem is with snort version?? My snort release is 2.9.4.6 and so_rules are relese 2.9.4.5 .... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- so_rules are not processed by pulledpork under FreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork under FreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 JJ Cummings (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 JJC (May 10)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork underFreeBSD 9.1 Seth Dunn (May 09)
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork under FreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: so_rules are not processed by pulledpork under FreeBSD 9.1 C. L. Martinez (May 10)