Snort mailing list archives
snort 2.9.1 segfault and general protection error
From: "Salvador, Mario" <MSALVADOR () broward org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 18:58:23 +0000
I am running RHEL 5.7 (Tikanga) x86-64 I ran snort with the so rules disabled, and gave the general protection after 30 mins. I ran snort with emergent rules after running pulledpork and gave the segmentation fault running for less than 1 hour. I had snort 2.9.0.5 running with so rules and ran OK. Is there some update on a more stable version of 2.9.1 ? Thanks, Mario Salvador, Systems Network Analyst Office: 954-357-5957 ________________________________ Under Florida law, most e-mail messages to or from Broward County employees or officials are public records, available to any person upon request, absent an exemption. Therefore, any e-mail message to or from the County, inclusive of e-mail addresses contained therein, may be subject to public disclosure. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- snort 2.9.1 segfault and general protection error Salvador, Mario (Oct 06)
- Re: snort 2.9.1 segfault and general protection error carlopmart (Oct 06)
- Re: snort 2.9.1 segfault and general protection error Joel Esler (Oct 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- snort 2.9.1 segfault and general protection error Salvador, Mario (Oct 06)