Snort mailing list archives
Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule
From: Michael Scheidell <michael.scheidell () secnap com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:35:33 -0500
On 2/1/11 1:56 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
That's not right. I'll bug this on our side for our developers to take a look.Would you consider it a bug to fail on a signal 30, if system build with targetbased, and doesn't have a targets.xml file?Joel
You might ask, why send a signal 30 to reload the targets.xml file if you don't have system compiled with --enable-targetbased?
(freebsd sends a signal 30 is you send it a SIGUSR1)I might ask, if --enable-targetbased is NOT specified, why include the code to look for the targets.xml file?
-- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN: 1259*1300 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness * Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 ______________________________________________________________________This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule waldo kitty (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)