Snort mailing list archives
Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule
From: Michael Scheidell <michael.scheidell () secnap com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:53:03 -0500
On 2/1/11 1:48 PM, Joel Esler wrote:
And the only difference is to add in the --enable-flexresp3? Joel
yes. then everything is fine.I might mention that I also have to oinkmaster out resp:* rules also, but that I expected. I didn't expect sensitive data rules to fail.
I am regres testing ports build options that a user can select.looking for combination that don't work, won't build, or won't work with VRT rules, ET rules, etc.
-- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN: 1259*1300 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness * Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 ______________________________________________________________________This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule waldo kitty (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Michael Scheidell (Feb 01)
- Re: Rules with SDF options cannot have other detection options in the same rule Joel Esler (Feb 01)