Snort mailing list archives
Re: msg update for these, please?
From: waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:02:28 -0400
On 9/28/2010 15:45, Jefferson, Shawn wrote:
Maybe something along the lines of: WEB-CLIENT Request for exe file and WEB-CLIENT Portable Executable binary file transfer which would explain what’s happening a little better, and avoid potential confusion hopefully.
yep, this is pretty close to what i came up with in my recent post on this thread now that it has been pointed out that 16425 is a GET request and not a POST or just a general either/or rule... i have to wait to see if i get an answer to what 16425 would look like if it were a POST rule, though... it may be possible, without having actually tested it (yet) that it will fire on things it is not intended to fire on... it is extremely generic with only the one content:".exe"; in it... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: msg update for these, please?, (continued)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Alex Kirk (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? Jefferson, Shawn (Sep 28)
- Re: msg update for these, please? waldo kitty (Sep 28)