Snort mailing list archives
Re: open source vs. GPL
From: Martin Roesch <roesch () sourcefire com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:30:47 -0400
I (and Sourcefire) wouldn't be writing hundreds of thousands of lines of code just for a licensing exercise, we could easily scrub Snort's existing code base of contributed code if we wanted to and save ourselves the time and effort. To get Snort where I want it to go as a technology requires a rewrite and there are engineering reasons for doing so. I think my response regarding spo_database was sufficient related to the latency of the module and its impact on packet processing. On the licensing I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree. Marty On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Loyal A Moses <loyalmoses () mac com> wrote:
It's classic foolery with the use of the words "open source". Snort today is a product that you can fork, and go sell if you like as long as you adhere to the GPL license. Snort tomorrow (version 3) is not going to allow you to fork and go sell should you wish, because Sourcefire is changing it's licensing, which arguably they actually can't do with the current GPL'd snort. Thus the reason why Marty has stated that they have developed version 3 will 100% non-contributed code. Which is an amazing task, that I would love to have seen. On Apr 14, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Christopher Jacob wrote: Did I miss a memo? When was it announced that Snort 3 would not be open source? ~chris ...sent from the road... On Apr 14, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Loyal A Moses <loyalmoses () mac com> wrote: Snort is open source, until version 3. But that is a whole other argument. On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Joel Esler wrote: No one is taking a vote, we just said, "if we had a vote in it..." I'd rather take the code out of the IDS/IPS and put it into an output module. One that is maintained well (as Shawn said). Snort is an open source program, I don't see harm in discussion on Snort's own mailing lists do you? J On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Loyal A Moses <loyalmoses () mac com> wrote:Is Sourcefire limited on development skill or man power? It makes no sense at all to remove one of the most common facilities in use by snort users because it is "too complex". In the end, you'll do what you are going to do regardless of the community -- we've seen it before. But don't use "complexity" and "bugs" as the excuse. Sourcefire is a publicly traded company -- Is it smart to be taking votes on product development from a mailing list? I wouldn't think so. Loyal. On Apr 14, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Jason Brvenik wrote:I have an ulterior motive and it is simple. Many of the bugs and issues over time with snort have been in output plugins. Make one well supported, tested, unified method designed for best performance and while doing so it improves the supportability and maintainability of the code base. On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Loyal A Moses <loyalmoses () mac com> wrote:My vote is to provide as many output options as possible, to help keep snort used as a tool. The argument of code complexity being a good reason to remove output facilities is only valid if the code is written poorly and not modular. This wheel doesn't need re-invented and this conversation is kind of silly, unless there is ulterior motives for actually wanting to remove this support. Loyal. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users-- joel esler | Sourcefire | gtalk: jesler () sourcefire com | 302-223-5974 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
-- Martin Roesch - Founder/CTO, Sourcefire Inc. - +1-410-290-1616 Sourcefire - Security for the Real World - http://www.sourcefire.com Snort: Open Source IDP - http://www.snort.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL, (continued)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Loyal A Moses (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Shirk Dog (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL JJ Cummings (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Loyal A Moses (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL JJ Cummings (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Shirk Dog (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Joel Esler (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Joel Esler (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Christopher Jacob (Apr 14)
- Re: open source vs. GPL Loyal A Moses (Apr 14)
- Re: open source vs. GPL Martin Roesch (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Paul Schmehl (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Loyal A Moses (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Martin Roesch (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Paul Schmehl (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Shirk Dog (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Randal T. Rioux (Apr 14)
- Message not available
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Shirk Dog (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Alan Shimel (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Matt Watchinski (Apr 14)
- Re: v2.8.4 incorrect logging to MySQL Martin Roesch (Apr 14)