Snort mailing list archives
Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ???
From: Michael D Schleif <mds () helices org>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 16:13:32 -0500
* On 2004:09:05:16:04:37-0500 I, Michael D Schleif <mds () helices org>, scribed: <snip />
No, it is *not* ``using all CPU''. Load is typically between 1 and 2; snort is typically using 2030% CPU; and other processes behave un-impaired.
<snip /> Hopefully, it is understood that that was intended to be: 20-30% hth -- Best Regards, mds - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Michael D Schleif (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jason (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jose Maria Lopez (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Michael D Schleif (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jose Maria Lopez (Sep 14)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jose Maria Lopez (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Michael D Schleif (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Michael D Schleif (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jason (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Michael D Schleif (Sep 05)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jason (Sep 06)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Michael D Schleif (Sep 06)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Omar McKenzie (Sep 06)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Michael D Schleif (Sep 06)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jason (Sep 06)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Michael D Schleif (Sep 06)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jason (Sep 06)
- RE: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? the measly one (Sep 07)
- Re: NFS file copy vs. snort ??? Jason (Sep 05)