Snort mailing list archives
RE: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"?
From: "Hutchinson, Andrew" <andrew.hutchinson () Vanderbilt Edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:57:03 -0500
That used to be a weakness, but not any longer if you use the new InnoDB engine. It has full transaction support. However, if I remember correctly, performance tests of MySQL show that its performance advantage over many other db's evaporates when transactions are used. IMHO, the main reason for using MySQL is that it can be mind-bendingly fast if you have it set up *without* transaction support. If you need transaction support, I would choose PostgreSQL - it's free, open, and has support not only for transactions but also for triggers, stored procedures, and all of the other nifty little things that make a full-featured rdbms handy. Again, this is my OPINION, not gospel. I don't want a database holy war here - it's a Snort list, after all... Andrew Hutchinson - Network Security Vanderbilt University Medical Center (615) 936-2856
-----Original Message----- From: Tom Van Overbeke [mailto:tvanoverbeke () ccncsi net] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:25 AM To: Snort-Users (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Snort-users] Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? *********************** Your mail has been scanned by InterScan MSS. - en dat is maar goed ook *********************** Wasn't one of the weaknesses of mysql that you can't do a rollback of a transaction ? once you change a record, there's no way to go back. other db's such as a oracle, require a commit statement before data is actually changed. as long as you don't do a commit, it's only in your sql session that you see the changes in the database. Tom.-----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net [mailto:snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net]On Behalf Of Rich Adamson Sent: 27 August 2003 15:31 To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"?I wouldn't recommend using mysql in an 'Enterprise'environment for anythingthat matters to you.By what reasons would you make such a comment? Could you clarify this statement?FWIW, I've worked with multiple companies (not small ones) that use MySql for lots of different apps (not just snort), and they are happy with it. Obviously, it doesn't have all the features that some commercial databases include, but when properly configured & tuned, can handle very large databases. I'd suggest the majority of the negative comments towards MySql on this list are either sourced by individuals that don't have aclue, or, byprofessional database administrators that know exactly where the weaknesses are (and how to deal with those in some reasonable/acceptable way). Given individual investments in training, your milage may vary. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"?, (continued)
- Re: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? Nagesh Chavan (Aug 28)
- RE: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? Hutchinson, Andrew (Aug 26)
- RE: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? Kreimendahl, Chad J (Aug 26)
- RE: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? Michael Steele (Aug 26)
- Re: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? cc (Aug 26)
- Re: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? Rich Adamson (Aug 27)
- RE: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? Tom Van Overbeke (Aug 27)
- Re: Anyone using "Enterprise implementation"? Jason Haar (Aug 31)