Snort mailing list archives
RE: Two items that are hard to digest...
From: "Michael Steele" <michaels () silicondefense com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:53:02 -0700
Chris, We were down to the end of the thread by identifying the reason for the discrepancy in the version numbers. I believe that the issue was sufficient enough to bring up and get to some sort of resolve, which we have. I can't imagine anything else that could be of value by continuing this thread. If someone has failed to grasp what has happened then, here it is, as best as I can tell. If you are a windows users and go to www.codecraftconsultants.com or to www.silicondefense.com and download "Snort_200rc5_Build72_Installer.exe" you will be downloading the "Release 2.0.0" version of snort. It seems that the version number for the Windows source code was not updated and that's why the same source code or build has a different version number for UNIX and Win32. -Michael -- Michael Steele | System Engineer / Support Technician mailto:michaels () silicondefense com Silicon Defense - The Cyber-War Defense Company Website: http://www.silicondefense.com Snort: Open Source Network IDS - http://www.snort.org -----Original Message----- From: snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net [mailto:snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net] On Behalf Of Chris Reid Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 10:18 AM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Okay, I believe the *nix version "2.0.0" versus Win32 version "2.0.0rc5" has been bantered back and forth sufficiently for this mailing list. I would like to end the discussion with the following summary of the cause. The problem is: these two version definitions are defined in two different places. "configure.in" for *nix, and the non-autogenerated "config.h" for Win32. The static Win32 config.h file never got updated in the tarball, so any person who downloads the official final 2.0.0 tarball from the snort.org website, compiles it, and then runs it will see version "2.0.0rc5", even though in fact they are running the official "2.0.0" version. Since this became apparent, I have tried to put measures in place to ensure this failure to synchronize these two versions does not happen again in the future. Nothing beneficial is gained by degrading the discussion down to a religious "my-platform-is-better-than-yours-is" flame war. I'm going to assume that everybody knows this, and that we're all smart enough not to be baited into participating. So, I suggest we all walk away from this thread now... Chris Reid ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- RE: Two items that are hard to digest..., (continued)
- RE: Two items that are hard to digest... Matt Kettler (Apr 17)
- RE: Two items that are hard to digest... Michael Steele (Apr 17)
- RE: Two items that are hard to digest... Matt Kettler (Apr 17)
- Re: Two items that are hard to digest... Chris Reid (Apr 17)
- Re: Two items that are hard to digest... Sam Evans (Apr 17)
- Re: Two items that are hard to digest... Chris Reid (Apr 17)
- Clarification: Two items that are hard to digest... Michael Steele (Apr 17)
- Re: Clarification: Two items that are hard to digest... Matt Kettler (Apr 17)
- Re: Where's Waldo^H^H^H^H^HErek Erek Adams (Apr 21)
- Re: Re: Where's Waldo^H^H^H^H^HErek David Alonso De La Vega Tapage (Apr 21)
- RE: Two items that are hard to digest... Michael Steele (Apr 17)
- RE: Two items that are hard to digest... Michael Steele (Apr 17)
- RE: Two items that are hard to digest... Matt Kettler (Apr 17)
- RE: Two items that are hard to digest... Michael Steele (Apr 17)
- Re: Two items that are hard to digest... Erick Mechler (Apr 17)