Snort mailing list archives
Re: order of matching rules
From: Chris Green <cmg () snort org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:25:19 -0400
Christopher Kruegel <chris () infosys tuwien ac at> writes:
Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com> writes: I think the fact that Snort 2.0 changed this behavior clearly indicates that a first exit strategy causes more problems that it solves. The massive number of alerts generated includes many that you do not care about - especially probing attacks. These are often filtered out automatically. You definitely do not want an attack that you care about being hidden behind a benign alert that gets discarded in an automatic way. Therefore, reporting _all_ rules that match seems to be a good idea.
Back when one of my primary functions was an analyst, I often took great pains to make sure that rule ordering didn't get in my way and I'd have a exact match, close match, pick up everything ordering to my ruleset. I liked that approach when I was only a user of snort and not one of the developer team. I certainly don't want a deluge of alerts to further compound the amount of data I'm looking at on a regular basis. The system should make better inferences of what an analyst wants to see. Now, snort-2.0 uses a concept of "most exact match" which currently goes based off the longest pattern match reached so it still only generates one alert. It just does it in a different manner to more closely approximate HOW the ordering was used.
If you're looking at snort-ng, look at the HEAD snort branch too. You'll be pleasantly suprised if you have the facilities to compare the two.I wonder what that means exactly - could you be a bit more specific :)
That means compare the approaches with high amounts of traffic if you have the resources to do so. -- Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com> Fame may be fleeting but obscurity is forever. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- order of matching rules archana rao (Oct 16)
- Re: order of matching rules Chris Green (Oct 16)
- Re: order of matching rules archana rao (Oct 17)
- Re: order of matching rules Chris Green (Oct 22)
- Re: order of matching rules archana rao (Oct 17)
- Re: order of matching rules Matt Kettler (Oct 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: order of matching rules Christopher Kruegel (Oct 22)
- Re: order of matching rules Christopher Kruegel (Oct 22)
- Re: order of matching rules Chris Green (Oct 22)
- Re: order of matching rules Chris Green (Oct 16)