Snort mailing list archives
Re: snort and network tap
From: "Scot Scot" <scotw () hotmail com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 23:20:57 -0500
Your TAP's are going to provide you with full-duplex traffic. If your traffic is not to high, 40MB or more, you will probably get away with using a hub. Regardless of the traffic load you will always stand a higher risk of loosing traffic using a half-duplex repeating (hub) device. I would recommend using a full-duplex switch to combine the traffic. You can then setup a mirrored, SPANed, or roving port (depending on what the manufacturer's lingo is for the switch you are using) to forward the combined traffic to your snort sensor. |------------------| TAP---Rx---- | Switch |----Mirrored Port------ |Snort-Sensor| TAP---Tx---- | | |------------------| If you have the $$$$$ laying around, many switches now do Layer 2-7 switching. This will allow you to forward specific types of Application traffic. Just to throw one out off the top of my head: TopLayer http://www.toplayer.com Just my 2.0134 cents worth (tax included) Scot Wiedenfeld ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Erickson" <redlamb () redlamb net> To: "Snort-Users List" <snort-users () lists sourceforge net> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: [Snort-users] snort and network tap
I am in the process of attaching snort to a network and am not too sure on
how to attach it with the network tap that I have. I have the Finisar UTP IL/1. I have been told to connect the 2 tap ports on the Network Tap to a hub and then connect the snort machine to the hub, but after reading some articles on the Snort-Users archive, I heard that I wil lose too many packets due to collisions and that this would not be a good choice. I also read on the snort FAQ that I can not run 1 instance of snort to monitor 2 interfaces, so I guess that is not too good of an options either. I am just wondering what the best way to connect my snort machine to the network using the network tap that I have. Thanks in advance.
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- snort and network tap Peter Erickson (Oct 16)
- Re: snort and network tap Michael Boman (Oct 16)
- Re: snort and network tap Bennett Todd (Oct 16)
- Re: snort and network tap Peter Erickson (Oct 16)
- Re: snort and network tap Scot Scot (Oct 16)
- Re: snort and network tap Jeff Nathan (Oct 17)
- Re: snort and network tap Michael Boman (Oct 16)