Snort mailing list archives
Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link
From: Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 16:39:15 -0400
"Ian Macdonald" <secsnort () dirk demon co uk> writes:
I think the problem is that you are only seeing one side of the conversation. Copper taps generally split the taped data into send and receive wires, So Tap A is one direction of the traffic and Tap B is the other.
That is the problem from snort with basic preprocessor stream reassembly mode. asychronous_link is to work around that and reassemble as well as it can. -- Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com> I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it. -- Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Holger . Woehle (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Ian Macdonald (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Holger . Woehle (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 15)
- Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link Chris Green (Aug 15)