Re: snort behind TAP & asynchronous_link

[Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>]

Holger.Woehle () arcor net writes:

> Snort does not recognize the alerts with the flow:to_server,established
> attributes.

Let me take another look at this.  I haven't taken a look at the
asynch state machine since it was added.  It *is* a state machine of
less quality.

The outer features are why we have a beta cycle :)

> I seems to me, that snort does not reassemble the stream.
> If i delete the established attribute snort recognises the alert.
> But then i run into my other problem (please see thread: snort seas no
> fragmented error).

Let me look at it some more. 
-- 
Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
"I'm beginning to think that my router may be confused."


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users