RE: FW: Two questions...

["Bob Walder" <bwalder () nss co uk>]

;o))

Regards,

Bob


-----Original Message-----
From: snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net
[mailto:snort-users-admin () lists sourceforge net]On Behalf Of J. C. Woods
Sent: 25 October 2001 18:34
To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] FW: Two questions...


Bob Walder wrote:
> Like I said - I am not Linux bashing - it is an excellent OS and I do not
> intend to be drawn into any further religious arguments.
>
> What I am saying - and probably a bit harshly initially, I admit, but I
was
> trying to rattle off a reply whilst extremely busy - is that OS choice
> should be strictly "horses for courses" not "my OS is better than your
OS".
> In our TESTING, we have proved FreeBSD 4.3 to be a more stable and better
> performing platform for Snort 1.8.1 than Red Hat Linux 7.1.
>
> That's all.
>
> Beyond that, YMMV
>
> Regards,
>
> Bob

Ya, but, when I consider the theological significance implicit in your
argument, would I then be able to discern an ontological differentiation
between your choice and my choice?

--
J. Craig Woods
UNIX/NT SA

-Art is the illusion of spontaneity-

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users