Snort mailing list archives
Re: FW: Two questions...
From: "J. C. Woods" <drjung () sprynet com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:34:12 -0500
Bob Walder wrote:
Like I said - I am not Linux bashing - it is an excellent OS and I do not intend to be drawn into any further religious arguments. What I am saying - and probably a bit harshly initially, I admit, but I was trying to rattle off a reply whilst extremely busy - is that OS choice should be strictly "horses for courses" not "my OS is better than your OS". In our TESTING, we have proved FreeBSD 4.3 to be a more stable and better performing platform for Snort 1.8.1 than Red Hat Linux 7.1. That's all. Beyond that, YMMV Regards, Bob
Ya, but, when I consider the theological significance implicit in your argument, would I then be able to discern an ontological differentiation between your choice and my choice? -- J. Craig Woods UNIX/NT SA -Art is the illusion of spontaneity- _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- FW: Two questions... Grimes, Shawn (NIA/IRP) (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: FW: Two questions... Bob Walder (Oct 25)
- RE: FW: Two questions... Bob Walder (Oct 25)
- RE: FW: Two questions... Wayne Work (Oct 25)
- RE: FW: Two questions... Bob Walder (Oct 25)
- Re: FW: Two questions... J. C. Woods (Oct 25)
- RE: FW: Two questions... Bob Walder (Oct 25)
- RE: FW: Two questions... Grimes, Shawn (NIA/IRP) (Oct 25)
- Re: RE: FW: Two questions... Martin Roesch (Oct 25)