Snort mailing list archives
RE: re: Professionalism
From: "Oxenreider, Jeff" <jox () safelite com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:03:58 -0500
LOL. This thread frankly, cracks me up. I can't people have the nerve to bitch about something that is simply solved by a little sed/grep work or non-use. Here's what I envision, Snort[tm] The Puritan Edition. Click <here> to download the rules and source code run through the only profanity checkers approved by the Vatican! <snicker> Or how 'bout this. If your company is so worried about what your IDS reports to you, don't hire people that explore porno on work hours.... :) SCORE! Get the lotion and get off your high horses! <cackle> P.S. If you have no sense of humor, delete this message, or put it through some wordsmithing app that will make me less offensive... :) Jeffrey Oxenreider Senior Network/Security Engineer -----Original Message----- From: Martin Roesch [mailto:roesch () sourcefire com] Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 7:55 PM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: Re: [Snort-users] re: Professionalism It's always nice to go on the road for a few days because I can almost always be sure that the [expletive deleted] will hit the fan in one way or another when I'm travelling and can't respond in an effective manner. <cut for brevity>
Current thread:
- RE: re: Professionalism, (continued)
- RE: re: Professionalism Steve Halligan (Nov 14)
- RE: Professionalism Mike Shaw (Nov 14)
- RE: Professionalism Joshua Wright (Nov 15)
- RE: re: Professionalism Scott Pham (Nov 15)
- RE: re: Professionalism James Fowler (Nov 15)
- Re: re: Professionalism Martin Roesch (Nov 17)
- Re: re: Professionalism Mark Rowlands (Nov 18)
- Re: re: Professionalism Jeff Nathan (Nov 19)
- Message not available
- Re: re: Professionalism Jeff Nathan (Nov 20)
- RE: re: Professionalism James Fowler (Nov 15)
- RE: re: Professionalism Wayne T Work (Nov 18)