Snort mailing list archives
RE: brut force attack not detected
From: Graeme Fowler <graeme.fowler () hosteurope com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 16:32:14 +0100
Paul wrote:
Alternatively, if you just want to monitor one port of the switch you could buy a cheap hub and put it between that port of the switch and the computer/router/whatever that was on that port, and put the Snort computer on another port of the hub.
...but remember that if you're in an environment where speed is important that this method will lose full-duplex capability. It can also break things with respect to maximum repeater count, so be careful if you have a long chained network. Graeme _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- brut force attack not detected Anthony Geoffron (Jul 25)
- RE: brut force attack not detected John Berkers (Jul 26)
- RE: brut force attack not detected Franki (Jul 26)
- Re: brut force attack not detected Kiira Triea (Jul 26)
- RE: brut force attack not detected Matthew Francis (Jul 26)
- Packet Motel (was: brut force attack not detected) Kiira Triea (Jul 26)
- RE: brut force attack not detected Franki (Jul 26)
- RE: brut force attack not detected John Berkers (Jul 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: brut force attack not detected Paul Smith (Jul 26)
- RE: brut force attack not detected Graeme Fowler (Jul 26)