Snort mailing list archives
Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole?
From: Ramin Alidousti <ramin () cannon eng us uu net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:46:02 -0400
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:43:29PM -0500, Crow, Owen wrote:
[...] Once again: 1. This is not Snort specific. Substitute tcpdump or possibly Netranger and you end up with similar issues.
Got it. What if you'd bring some part of the snort functionality in the kernel. I'm just thinking outloud though. What other options do we have to eliminate the buffer overflow flaw?
2. It's all highly theoretical (until it gets implemented).
You've already come up with a high level design ;-) The rest shouldn't be that hard. Thanks, Owen. Ramin
Owen
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? ks (Jul 12)
- Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Daniel Voyer (Jul 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Crow, Owen (Jul 12)
- Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Ramin Alidousti (Jul 12)
- RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Crow, Owen (Jul 12)
- Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Ramin Alidousti (Jul 12)
- RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Steve Hutchins (Jul 12)
- RE: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Frank Knobbe (Jul 12)
- Re: Antwort: RE: Snort-Machine = Security Hole? Ramin Alidousti (Jul 12)