Secure Coding mailing list archives
re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable
From: ches () lumeta com (Bill Cheswick)
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 20:34:16 +0100
Here's a depressing survey
I found it utterly unsurprising. The bad guys almost never erase hard drives, or do other terribly inconvenient things to the machines they own. They simply run in the background, mostly, and the users don't understand the issues. My father has repeatedly asked why he should care that his computer is totally owned. I've told him that his CPU engine is blowing blue smoke all over the Internet, but that doesn't help. An outbreak of user-obvious malware might change the equation, but I am not suggesting that someone run the experiment. ches
Current thread:
- RE: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable, (continued)
- RE: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Arian J. Evans (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Greenarrow 1 (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Dave Aronson (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Jeff Williams (May 01)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Michael Silk (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Kenneth R. van Wyk (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable ljknews (May 02)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 03)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Michael Silk (May 03)
- Re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Crispin Cowan (May 01)
- Re: re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Gunnar Peterson (May 02)
- Re: re: Why Software Will Continue to Be Vulnerable Blue Boar (May 03)