Secure Coding mailing list archives
Re: ACM Queue article and security education
From: ljknews <ljknews () mac com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 21:19:55 +0100
At 9:10 AM -0700 7/1/04, Blue Boar wrote:
Language X may very well be a much better starting point, I don't know. I do believe that it will never be properly looked at until the whole world starts using it for everything, though.
I think it will be properly considered when the most strict portion of the software world is using language X. I have used many programs where the flaws in the program make it clear that I care not one whit about whether the authors of that program have opinion about anything I might use. They are simply not competent, either as individuals or else as an organization. -- Larry Kilgallen
Current thread:
- Re: ACM Queue article and security education George Capehart (Jun 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ACM Queue article and security education Michael Canty (Jul 01)
- RE: ACM Queue article and security education Peter Amey (Jul 01)
- Re: ACM Queue article and security education Blue Boar (Jul 01)
- RE: ACM Queue article and security education Michael S Hines (Jul 01)
- Re: ACM Queue article and security education ljknews (Jul 01)
- Re: ACM Queue article and security education Blue Boar (Jul 01)
- Re: ACM Queue article and security education ljknews (Jul 02)
- Re: ACM Queue article and security education Blue Boar (Jul 01)
- Re: ACM Queue article and security education Blue Boar (Jul 02)