Secure Coding mailing list archives

RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding

From: Nick Lothian <nl () essential com au>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:55:45 +0100

I'd also point out that if it's languages you're trying to list,
JavaScript arguably should not have a separate entry from Java


Yes it should - they are substantially different languages, even if we look
at them only syntactically. You could argue that Javascript should be listed
as ECMAScript, though. There are a bigger problems with that list than this,
though.

Nick

Current thread:

Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding, (continued)
- - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Dave Aronson (Jul 20)
    - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Mark Rockman (Jul 21)
  - RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding ljknews (Jul 20)
    - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Erik van Konijnenburg (Jul 21)
  - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding der Mouse (Jul 20)
  - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Crispin Cowan (Jul 21)
    - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Craig E. Ward (Jul 22)
  - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding James Walden (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Peter Amey (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Wall, Kevin (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Nick Lothian (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Michael S Hines (Jul 22)
  - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Mark Rockman (Jul 23)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Nick Lothian (Aug 02)
  - RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding ljknews (Aug 02)