Secure Coding mailing list archives

RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding

From: "Michael S Hines" <mshines () purdue edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:21:07 +0100

Concur this is a 'rabbit trail' not worth pursuing.

For those who assisted with the list, thank you.

Otherwise, I suggest we return to our regularly scheduled program at this
time.

Mike Hines 
-----------------------------------
Michael S Hines
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Current thread:

Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding, (continued)
- - - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Mark Rockman (Jul 21)
  - RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding ljknews (Jul 20)
    - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Erik van Konijnenburg (Jul 21)
  - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding der Mouse (Jul 20)
  - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Crispin Cowan (Jul 21)
    - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Craig E. Ward (Jul 22)
  - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding James Walden (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Peter Amey (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Wall, Kevin (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Nick Lothian (Jul 21)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Michael S Hines (Jul 22)
  - Re: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Mark Rockman (Jul 23)
- RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding Nick Lothian (Aug 02)
  - RE: Programming languages -- the "third rail" of secure coding ljknews (Aug 02)