Re: Penetration of HP/UX

[Paul Melson <pmelson () gmail com>]

On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Philipp Lachberger <ph_lachi () yahoo de> wrote:
> To all who found my deadly mistake of saying SPARC architecture instead
> of PA-RISC - Thank you very much (at least I got the Endianess right ;-) )

You didn't really.  Both PA-RISC and IA64 have switchable endianness. As I said in my initial response, the issue with 
writing shellcode for PA-RISC is that the registers and some of the instruction set are completely different from x86.  
Forget byte order, you have to learn a different version of assembly. 

Read the Phrack article Marco provided a link for.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board

Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT 
and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified.

http://www.iacertification.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------