Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications
From: Danny <Danny () drexel edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:23:01 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've not seen a comparison, but in my opinion remote scanning is a waste of time and money for large networks such as anything over a class C. Having someone do a full vulnerability scan remotely over your entire IP space takes a lot of time and a lot of bandwidth, if a company is on a T1 it could take several hours and may impact the performance of their corporate link. Having said that, if someone was to come up with a semi remote scanning option for a managed service it may be a little more feasible. By semi remote I mean the scanning company has an agent on the local LAN which handles the actual scanning and simply reports back to an offsite database for analysis. Currently we are using SecureScanNX from vigilante.com. This tool allow us to do full vuln scans of our entire network, we have agents placed at various points of the network which handle the scanning for their network segments and report back to a controlling terminal, doing this stops us from flooding our WAN/MAN links and keeps the scans times down relatively low. Cheers Danny Network Security Engineer Drexel University PGP Print: C6AD B205 E3C6 38AB 0164 6604 66F5 CCFC F4ED F1E0 PGP Key: http://akasha.irt.drexel.edu/danny.asc - -----Original Message----- From: Alfred Huger [mailto:ah () securityfocus com] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:06 PM To: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications Hey all, I have a question, which is two fold. First can anyone point me to comparison articles of online scanners (such as Foundstone) vrs. standalone applications such as ISS? I am looking for technical comparisons not a treatise on the benefits of someone managing your scanning for you or not. The second part of the question is, are their any technical advantages between the two setups? I understand this overlaps with the first question but I ask this after having searched for good writeups and came out with very little. - -al Alfred Huger Symantec Corp. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- <Pre>Do you know the base address of the Global Offset Table (GOT) on a Solaris 8 box? CORE IMPACT does.</Pre> <A href="http://www.securityfocus.com/core"> http://www.securityfocus.com/core</A> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0 iQA/AwUBPl0+/Gb1zPz07fHgEQKNMgCZAWiZsphU4AWefT4ZVXUl9oABhw0AnjPA 8yiC4zH8B+tKwm6COkxg34Ed =Z1G+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- <Pre>Do you know the base address of the Global Offset Table (GOT) on a Solaris 8 box? CORE IMPACT does.</Pre> <A href="http://www.securityfocus.com/core"> http://www.securityfocus.com/core</A>
Current thread:
- Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications Alfred Huger (Feb 26)
- RE: Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications Filipe Custodio (Feb 27)
- Re: Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications Fernando Martins (Feb 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications Danny (Feb 27)
- Re: Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications Gene Yoo (Feb 28)
- Re: Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications oherrera (Feb 27)
- RE: Online Scanning Services Vrs. Stand Alone Applications Davi Ottenheimer (Feb 28)