Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: L0phtCrack 3.0
From: "Block, Edward" <BLOCKED () mail northgrum com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 05:36:37 -0700
I've noticed the same thing. Same machine running 2.x would crack the username=password in under 5 seconds, now it is upward of 30. The dictionary attack, which used to take under a couple minutes is now pushing 20+. I don't know when I'll have time to investigate, but I'm John is looking better everyday. Eddie
-----Original Message----- From: Parth Galen [SMTP:Parth_Galen () ziplip com] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 5:21 PM To: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: L0phtCrack 3.0 I recently upgraded to 3.0, and have found that it "appears" to run MUCH slower. I have checked the settings and documentation, but nothing I have noticed points to why there would be a noticable slowdown in cracting. With 2.5 I would get the trivials in seconds. With 3.0 and the same sam_ it takes more than a day to get the most trivial which should have shown up in a basic dictionary. I understand the 3.0 now cracks sam's that are SYSKEY'd, could that be part of it? Any comments will be much appreciated! Parth
Current thread:
- L0phtCrack 3.0 Parth Galen (Jun 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: L0phtCrack 3.0 Block, Edward (Jun 08)
- Offline NT/2000 Registry & Password Editor Hostfarm Security (Jun 11)
- Re: Offline NT/2000 Registry & Password Editor Jens Link (Jun 11)
- Re: L0phtCrack 3.0 olle (Jun 13)
- Offline NT/2000 Registry & Password Editor Hostfarm Security (Jun 11)
- RE: L0phtCrack 3.0 Seth Georgion (Jun 08)