PaulDotCom mailing list archives
Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees
From: Andrew Anderson <andycapp92 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:10:13 -0700
I concur with Phillip and Mike's take on things. When I completed my degree it was with some individuals whom I thought had worked hard, grown as individuals as well as grown their skill sets; and then there were individuals whom in my opinion had bitched, complained and basically floated/faked (take your pick) through most of the degree. You don't get what you pay for, moreover you get out a reflection of what you are willing to put into it. The same applies to Certs. One important thing that I think hasn't been mentioned yet is that a full-time program for many people will teach (provided they are serious about it) individuals how to effectively learn the material. This may be especially true for our younger peers. If you are attending a decent school this should apply to group and individual learning situations. I think that my certs, degree, and work experience are all important items on my resume. I also think that I leverage all of the soft skills, theory and specific skills that I honed/learned in school and on Cert courses on a regular basis. Jeremy's point about those who are making the decisions is definitely not lost on me either. Andrew Anderson On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Phillip Bristow <pbristow () siu edu> wrote:
Hello all, I just graduated from a school that had a security program, the great thing about it was that we were encouraged to work on our own projects and integrate them into the curriculum. This is what I think that makes a good program is when you are encouraged to find alternative means to accomplish a task and allowed to implement the solution. I guess I am mostly seconding Mike Patterson's point that you will only get what you put into your education, also it is an expensive approach to gaining knowledge. On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Jeremy Pommerening <theaudioman () yahoo comwrote:I agree with your point. However I have considered getting a masters or even an MBA for the same reason he mentioned. The people that matter (the ones that will pay me the big bucks) seem to respect the paper more than the knowledge or abilities. Jeremy Pommerening CISSP,GCFA,GPEN,GAWN,GCFW, MCSE Win2K, MCSE NT4 --- On *Tue, 2/1/11, Adrian Crenshaw <irongeek () irongeek com>* wrote: From: Adrian Crenshaw <irongeek () irongeek com> Subject: [Pauldotcom] The future, what employers look for, and degrees To: "PaulDotCom Security Weekly Mailing List" < pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com> Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 4:50 PM Ok, I was speaking with someone today from a different field today that has a masters. I alluded to the fact that I'm loosing interest in the "Security Informatics" masters program I'm in because of lack of perceived applicability, time taken that I could use learning other things, and it seems like there is a huge disconnect between academia vs. what I see in the industry (through my admittedly limited experience listening to podcast, reading forums/mailing list, going to conferences, etc). His take was that I'd be competing with people in the future, and the masters degree could likely be the deciding factor. Do you think that is really true? Or do you think employers will start to see academia as it has become to be a largely wasteful exercise vs. getting your name out there and learning/getting experience on your own? When I hear about people going into great debt to get something that amounts to a union card in many cases (a degree), it kind of makes be hope the whole system can be reformed. For what I've seen in the industry, it seems to mater more what people know you for than any degree you have. Am I wrong? Anyone got a different way to look at it? Adrian -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com<http://mc/compose?to=Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com> http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com _______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
_______________________________________________ Pauldotcom mailing list Pauldotcom () mail pauldotcom com http://mail.pauldotcom.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pauldotcom Main Web Site: http://pauldotcom.com
Current thread:
- The future, what employers look for, and degrees Adrian Crenshaw (Feb 01)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees d4ncingd4n (Feb 01)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Adrian Crenshaw (Feb 02)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Ryan Dewhurst (Feb 01)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Kevin Shaw (Feb 01)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Mike Patterson (Feb 01)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Jeremy Pommerening (Feb 02)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Phillip Bristow (Feb 02)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Andrew Anderson (Feb 04)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Phillip Bristow (Feb 02)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees Kevin (Feb 07)
- Re: The future, what employers look for, and degrees d4ncingd4n (Feb 01)