oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Gentoo's "contributing back" linux-distros tasks


From: Solar Designer <solar () openwall com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 21:44:20 +0100

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 10:48:30AM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Anthony Liguori <aliguori () amzn com> writes:

Solar Designer <solar () openwall com> writes:

13. Keep track of per-report and per-issue handling and disclosure
timelines (at least times of notification of the private list and of
actual public disclosure), at regular intervals produce and share
statistics (most notably, the average embargo duration) as well as the
raw data (except on issues that are still under embargo) by posting to
oss-security - primary: Gentoo, backup: Amazon

and we saw some contributions from Gentoo on these, most notable being
their work on the statistics (task 13 above):

https://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros/stats

Unfortunately, the last update of these statistics ("Last modified:
2019/10/15 01:52 by kristianf") is also when the contributions ceased.

As part of planning on getting this going again, I want to just review
the cadence and update duration.

I think this is easiest to do on the 15th of every month for the
previous month.  As example, on 2/15, we would post the statistics for
February.  Since the maximum embargo duration is 2-weeks, this would not
disclose any embargoed information.

Does this seem reasonable?

You mean for January.  Yes.

Occasionally there will be an issue that should have already been made
public but actually wasn't yet, or not on oss-security.  An issue where
others responsible failed to ensure its timely and proper public
disclosure.  In such cases, I expect the person working on the
statistics task would notice that and help ensure this issue is made
public without further delay and properly (such as by pinging others to
do it), and only then will post the statistics including the issue.  In
fact, if the statistics task is correctly worked on, such issues with
issues are impossible not to notice: every issue in the published raw
data for the statistics should have its corresponding oss-security
posting referenced.  So you'd notice when trying to fill in that field.

Alexander


Current thread: