oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: TORCS 1.3.2 xml buffer overflow - CVE-2012-1189
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger () redhat com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:42:39 +0100
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:31:10 -0500 Andres Gomez wrote:
2012/3/5 Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>Would you consider tham to be the same code base or a different code base? If the same code base, share the CVE, if different code bases, new CVE for it. Steve: do we have a policy for "Fresh" forks as it were?Well, Speed Dreams started with TORCS code base, but they have added a lot new code, so I would say that right now they have different code base, although they still share a big portion of the code (as the vulnerable section). Because of that I would consider It needs a new CVE number, could you assign one to it? :)
Their code bases may differ significantly in other parts, but it seems the affected vulnerable code is still identical between the two. Following are versions shortly before fixes got committed: http://torcs.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/torcs/torcs/torcs/src/modules/graphic/ssggraph/grsound.cpp?revision=1.31.2.2&view=markup http://speed-dreams.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/speed-dreams/trunk/src/modules/graphic/ssggraph/grsound.cpp?revision=4146&view=markup In cases like this, same CVE is used for all project that use / embed the same affected code. -- Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- TORCS 1.3.2 xml buffer overflow - CVE-2012-1189 Andres Gomez (Feb 18)
- Re: TORCS 1.3.2 xml buffer overflow - CVE-2012-1189 Andres Gomez (Mar 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: TORCS 1.3.2 xml buffer overflow - CVE-2012-1189 Andres Gomez (Mar 06)
- Re: Re: TORCS 1.3.2 xml buffer overflow - CVE-2012-1189 Tomas Hoger (Mar 06)
- Re: Re: TORCS 1.3.2 xml buffer overflow - CVE-2012-1189 Andres Gomez (Mar 09)
- Message not available
- Re: TORCS 1.3.2 xml buffer overflow - CVE-2012-1189 Andres Gomez (Mar 05)