oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: econet iovec
From: Eugene Teo <eugene () redhat com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:36:37 +0800
Thomas, thanks for the heads-up. Appreciated it. On 11/15/2010 12:09 AM, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
This also raises a question of whether it's worth assigning CVEs to every vulnerability that was fixed by a single change in the core code. I'm leaning towards "no".
Yeah, It wouldn't make much sense too.Distros should backport the changes made to mitigate such issues. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/651927, and the following patches:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/253eacc070b114c2ec1f81b067d2fed7305467b0 http://git.kernel.org/linus/8acfe468b0384e834a303f08ebc4953d72fb690a Thanks, Eugene -- main(i) { putchar(182623909 >> (i-1) * 5&31|!!(i<7)<<6) && main(++i); }
Current thread:
- econet iovec Thomas Pollet (Nov 14)
- Re: econet iovec Dan Rosenberg (Nov 14)
- Re: econet iovec Dan Rosenberg (Nov 14)
- Re: econet iovec Eugene Teo (Nov 14)
- Re: econet iovec Steven M. Christey (Nov 15)
- Re: econet iovec Dan Rosenberg (Nov 15)
- Re: econet iovec Dan Rosenberg (Nov 14)
- Re: econet iovec Dan Rosenberg (Nov 14)