Nmap Development mailing list archives
Prabhjyot's Status Report - #5 of 17
From: Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi <prabhjyotsingh95 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 07:48:11 +0530
Hey list, This week had a bunch of twists and turns. As abhishek, I too kind of deviated from my objective. We have been thinking about alternative methods for data representation in the prints. Accomplishments * performed experiments and found the set of parameters that work well with the dataset. * Tried the classifier implementation in the python lib sklearn. Got a 295/301 accuracy on the training sample. * Thought about the current representation of the dataset and discussed an alternate representation. (this is related to the reducing of groups I had mentioned last week) * Pushed gsoc_trial (git repo that I use) to nmap-private-dev/fp/ipv6 to allow other nmap commiters to view my progress. Priorities * Identify problems with opencv (accuracy is just 115/301, on similar parameters) * Try out the new dataset representation and the resulting accuracy. * Try out a training testing ratio of 80:20, to better gauge how accurate the models are. Cheers, Prabhjyot
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Prabhjyot's Status Report - #5 of 17 Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi (May 30)