Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: [nmap-svn] r33611 - in nmap: nselib nselib/lpeg scripts
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:52:33 -0500
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com> wrote:
httpspider -> http/spider.lua
In this case, I believe we could also move http.lua to http/init.lua, but I don't know that that is a good idea.
asn1.lua -> enc/asn1.lua base32.lua -> enc/base32.lua base64.lua -> enc/base64.lua json.lua -> xchange/json.lua
I know you're just giving your first thoughts, but I don't see why JSON should be treated any differently than ASN.1.
nsedebug -> stdnse/debug.lua (do we even use this anymore?)
Yes! I use nsedebug.tostr quite often when refining scripts.
I think obviously we could aggressively reorganize everything but that would be painful to say the least. So maybe just a few things (or not at all). I don't know if anyone else cares about this.
I'm not opposed to it. There are currently 113 libraries and 484 scripts. If anything, it seems like the scripts could use some hierarchical classification; but that seems like a much harder problem to tackle and more disruptive to users. Dan _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: [nmap-svn] r33611 - in nmap: nselib nselib/lpeg scripts Patrick Donnelly (Aug 25)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r33611 - in nmap: nselib nselib/lpeg scripts Daniel Miller (Aug 25)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r33611 - in nmap: nselib nselib/lpeg scripts Patrick Donnelly (Aug 25)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r33611 - in nmap: nselib nselib/lpeg scripts Daniel Miller (Aug 25)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r33611 - in nmap: nselib nselib/lpeg scripts Patrick Donnelly (Aug 25)
- Re: [nmap-svn] r33611 - in nmap: nselib nselib/lpeg scripts Daniel Miller (Aug 25)