Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 10:39:26 -0600
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Henri Doreau <henri.doreau () gmail com> wrote:
Thanks, good job! I checked it in (r32707), with a single change: resolve_internal() takes `port' as an unsigned short though it was declared as taking it as unsigned short *.
Henri, Do you think this (SOCKS 5 support) could be added to nsock directly? I haven't looked at the code, but I suspect that Ncat's proxy support could be replaced with appropriate proxied-Nsock functions. Dan _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Petr Stodůlka (Jan 03)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Petr Stodůlka (Jan 17)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Petr Stodůlka (Jan 28)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Avisuals (Jan 28)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Henri Doreau (Feb 01)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Henri Doreau (Feb 09)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Daniel Miller (Feb 09)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Henri Doreau (Feb 09)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Petr Stodůlka (Feb 13)
- Re: NCAT: SOCKS5 patch Petr Stodůlka (Feb 13)