Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:50:37 -0500
On 04/26/2013 12:13 PM, David Fifield wrote:
As long as this is being reworked, the oft-requested "exclude-ports" option should probably be implemented. It's really the only reason that the old (undocumented) behavior is useful.On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:24:57PM +0530, Prakash Gamit wrote:$ nmap -p1234,5678,1111,4321 --top-ports 2 <ip-address> scans top two ports(1111,1234 in this case) of the list given with -p. see this thread => http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2012/q3/382I think that feature should be removed in favor of taking the union.
Dan _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project Prakash Gamit (Apr 26)
- Re: GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project David Fifield (Apr 26)
- Re: GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project Daniel Miller (Apr 26)
- Re: GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project Prakash Gamit (Apr 27)
- Re: GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project Daniel Miller (Apr 26)
- Re: GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project David Fifield (Apr 26)