Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap 6 bug: get_srcaddr
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:50:58 -0700
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:35:57AM +0200, Martin Clausen wrote:
So I just upgraded to Nmap 6. While testing I ran into this little problem: C:\Temp\server-lans>nmap -T3 -sn 10.80.0.0/16 -dd -vv Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-05-23 10:30 Romance Daylight Time Winpcap present, dynamic linked to: WinPcap version 4.1.2 (packet.dll version 4.1.0.2001), based on libpcap version 1.0 branch 1_0_rel0b (20091008) NPF service is already running. Fetchfile found C:\Program Files\Nmap/nmap.xsl The max # of sockets we are using is: 0 --------------- Timing report --------------- hostgroups: min 1, max 100000 rtt-timeouts: init 1000, min 100, max 10000 max-scan-delay: TCP 1000, UDP 1000, SCTP 1000 parallelism: min 0, max 0 max-retries: 10, host-timeout: 0 min-rate: 0, max-rate: 0 --------------------------------------------- get_srcaddr: can't connect socket: The requested address is not valid in its context. nexthost: failed to determine route to 10.80.0.0 QUITTING!
Is this on Windows XP? Does it work to scan the targets 10.80.1-254.1-254? David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Nmap 6 bug: get_srcaddr Martin Clausen (May 26)
- Re: Nmap 6 bug: get_srcaddr Mario Vigliar (May 27)
- Re: Nmap 6 bug: get_srcaddr David Fifield (May 29)
- Re: Nmap 6 bug: get_srcaddr Mike Rodriguez (Jun 02)
- Re: Nmap 6 bug: get_srcaddr David Fifield (Jun 07)
- Re: Nmap 6 bug: get_srcaddr Mike Rodriguez (Jun 02)