Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: status report #6 of 15
From: kirubakaran S <kirubakaran1989 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:49:18 +0530
Hello,
I don't think we should inclue "License" for two reasons: 1) The license doesn't really matter for people USING the scripts. Everyone is allowed to use it. The license only matters for people who redistribute scripts, and such people can get the information from reading the source or the NSEDoc. 2) All 128 scripts have exactly the same license text anyway. The "Author" field is a a tougher choice. It is not very relevant to the Zenmap user either, but I can also see some arguments for keeping it. Overall though, I think I'd rather see the Author field in the script source and the NSEDoc (as is the case now), but not in the Zenmap interface itself. Okay, This is the prototype of script selection interface.
I will see to that license fields and author are not included in zenmap interface itself. Thanks for your suggestion! -- cheers Kirubakaran.S _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Status report #6 of 15, (continued)
- Status report #6 of 15 Dražen Popović (Jun 08)
- Re: Status report #6 of 15 David Fifield (Jun 08)
- Re: Status report #6 of 15 Djalal Harouni (Jun 08)
- Re: status report #6 of 15 kirubakaran S (Jun 08)
- Re: status report #6 of 15 David Fifield (Jun 08)
- Re: status report #6 of 15 Felix Wolfsteller (Jun 09)
- Re: status report #6 of 15 David Fifield (Jun 09)
- Re: status report #6 of 15 Felix Wolfsteller (Jun 09)
- Re: status report #6 of 15 kirubakaran S (Jun 09)
- Re: status report #6 of 15 Fyodor (Jun 11)
- Re: status report #6 of 15 kirubakaran S (Jun 11)
- Status report #6 of 15 Dražen Popović (Jun 08)